Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00868
Original file (BC 2014 00868.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00868

					COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 




APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her records be corrected by restoring 2.5 days of leave that she lost.  


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She was deployed Apr 11 to Apr 12, and unable to take leave while AFCENT Surgeon General (SG) staff was in transition during the period 2012 to 2013.  When she checked her Leave and Earning Statement (LES) 28 Oct 13, she discovered she lost 2.5 days of leave.  On two occasions she was told by her Military Personnel Flight (MPF) that she would not lose her protected leave balance until 2015 as long as her leave balance did not go below 75 days.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant currently serves in the Regular Air Force in the grade of colonel (O-6).

From 17 Apr 11 to 3 Apr 12, the applicant was deployed to Afghanistan. 

From 4 Apr 12 to 3 Apr 14, the applicant was assigned to the AFCENT/SG staff, Shaw AFB, SC.  

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    




AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice that warrants restoring 2.5 days of leave to the applicant’s records.  In accordance with AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, Special Leave Accrual (SLA) is a program authorized to allow members to accrue a leave balance larger than the legal maximum of 60 days (or 75 days during the period 1 Oct 08 to 30 Sep 15).  In order to qualify for this program, Air Force members must have been deployed or participated in national missions that prohibited them from taking leave during the fiscal year which caused them to go over the maximum allowable leave balance.  SLA shall not be used as a means to authorize the accumulation of leave in excess of 60 days (75 days from 1 Oct 08 through 30 Sep 15) that is a result of members' failure to properly manage their leave balance.  If, at any time, the leave balance drops to or goes below 60 days (75 days during the period 1 Oct 08 to 30 Sep 15), then there is no longer any SLA protected leave. Therefore, the actual maximum leave that can be carried forward into succeeding fiscal years is the lowest leave balance achieved following the completion of the SLA duty or the usual 60 days (75 days during the period 1 Oct 08 to 30 Sep 15), whichever is greater. 

In review of the applicant’s Master Military Pay Account (MMPA), her starting leave balance in FY13 (1 Oct 12) was 81.5 days.  The applicant took 19 days of leave between Oct 12 and Feb 13, and earned 11 days of leave during this period.  This resulted in the member reducing her leave balance below 75 days and no longer having protected leave under SLA.  As the applicant was no longer eligible for SLA when this happened, she lost 2.5 days of leave when FY13 began because her leave balance exceeded 75 days.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 7 Jan 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-00868 in Executive Session on 24 Feb 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 20 Feb 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 10 Nov 14.
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Jan 15.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00111

    Original file (BC 2014 00111.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was deployed from 22 Apr to 27 Oct 13 and was not allowed to take leave during this period. The application must clearly establish an error or injustice by the Air Force caused the member’s lost leave. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01001

    Original file (BC 2013 01001.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His wing commander agreed that he should be restored 10 days of leave and approved a Special Leave Accrual (SLA) request. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that he was deployed on Contingency Exercise Deployment (CED) orders prior to starting his already- approved ten days of use/lose leave for FY12. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00129

    Original file (BC-2010-00129.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 30 Oct 07, a request for special leave accrual (SLA) was submitted on the applicant’s behalf, which resulted in 2.5 days of lost leave being restored. In addition, DFAS restored 2.5 days of lost leave twice, although the applicant requested 2.5 days of lost leave a year later. Per DoD FMR, Volume 7A, Chapter 35, Leave Accounting, para b.3, if at any time the leave balance drops to or goes below 60 days prior to 1 Oct 08, then there is no longer any SLA protected leave.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01775

    Original file (BC 2012 01775.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the information provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility the applicant carried forward 63.5 days of leave at the beginning of FY 2010. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit C....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01027

    Original file (BC-2012-01027.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01027 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Eight (8) days of leave be restored to his leave account. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01612

    Original file (BC-2012-01612.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01612 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 4 days of lost leave be restored. AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, explains SLA shall not be a means to authorize the accumulation of leave in excess of 60 days (75 days from 1 October 2008 through 30 September 2013) when it is a result of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011025

    Original file (20130011025.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 December 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130011025 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides: a. Army Regulation 600-8-10, paragraph 2-2, cautions Soldiers who maintain a maximum leave balance that they risk loss of leave if the operational situation prevents them from taking leave before the end of the FY.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04787

    Original file (BC-2012-04787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary which is attached at Exhibits C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating the applicant has not demonstrated a clear error or injustice. If at any time the leave balance drops to or goes below 75 days, then there is no longer any SLA protected leave. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00768

    Original file (BC 2014 00768.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    If he had known he would be losing six days of leave then he would have made adjustments to his PTDY and terminal leave dates. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant did not use six days of his annual/ordinary leave...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000710C070206

    Original file (20050000710C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DFAS explained that, according to their internal instructions, he was authorized to carry over (in excess of 60 days) into the new fiscal year only the amount of days he earned while in the combat zone. His total authorized leave balance at the end of September 2003 should have been 75 days (15 days SLA leave and 60 days regular leave). He took 92 days.